In This Issue
Mythbuster
It's Being Done
What's New
Other Voices

What's New

NAEP Scores Disappointing

NAEP scores are out. For those looking for unequivocal good news, the 2005 report on the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) was not it. Reading scores inched up slightly in fourth-grade but dropped a tiny bit in eighth-grade. Math scores at the fourth-grade level were up significantly, less so in eighth grade.

But if we know anything, we know that only part of the story is in those aggregate numbers. The really interesting stories are in the disaggregated numbers.

When we disaggregate the data, fourth-grade math numbers look better because every demographic group – Black, Latino, White, Asian, Native American and low-income children – posted the highest scores ever recorded on the main NAEP test. In fourth-grade reading, all groups of students, with the exception of Native American children, also scored at their highest levels since the first administration of the main NAEP.

Even more profound, the proportion of African-American fourth-graders performing below basic in math has declined from 65 percent to 40 percent since 2000. In many states, the percentage of students who score “Below Basic,” dropped for not only African-American students but also Latino and poor students. This is significant because it is these students who have been so long neglected by many schools and who have been stuck at the bottom of the achievement ladder for a long time. In many places, they are climbing. For example, in New Jersey, the percentage of poor students who scored below basic dropped by 9 points from 2003 to 2005; Latinos dropped by 7 points and African Americans by 12 points. It would be better if they had all moved into the proficient category, but moving them out of below basic reflects that schools are beginning to focus on teaching our most vulnerable students at least enough so that they understand whether a number is even or odd, can subtract two-digit numbers from three-digit numbers, and grasp mathematics at its most basic.

New Jersey isn’t alone in getting this growth – states as different as Pennsylvania, Florida, and Arkansas all saw substantial improvements in the percentage of African- American, Latino, and poor students scoring below basic.

Lots of others stories are found at the state level.

Take, for example, Massachusetts, which has pursued rigorous school reform for some time now, and has some of the highest standards currently in use. It is now scoring at the top of the country for reading for Whites and African Americans, although its scores for Latino students are still disappointing.

North Carolina, which was a leader in school reform throughout the 1990s, and improved on NAEP in the 1990s, seems to have stalled between 2003 and 2005, which raises questions about whether it needs to recalibrate and reconfigure its standards and assessments.

One thing is certain: the education world will be analyzing NAEP data for some time to get insights into which states are on the right track and which ones seriously off-track.

To read some interesting analysis of NAEP, go to The Education Trust. To see the NAEP data itself, go to NAEP.

 

An Urgent Call to Action

If the United States wants to stay a scientific and technological leader of the world, it had better improve the math and science education of public schools – and fast.
That’s the recommendation of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS), which was asked by Senators Lamar Alexander and Jeff Bingaman to answer the question:

“What are the top 10 actions, in priority order, that federal policy-makers could take to enhance the science and technology enterprise so that the United States can successfully compete, prosper, and be secure in the global community of the 21st Century? What strategy, with several concrete steps, could be used to implement each of those actions?”


To answer, the NAS assembled a group of scientific, business, university and school leaders who recently issued a report, “Rising above the Gathering Storm: Energizing and Employing America for a Brighter Economic Future.” The report makes many recommendations having to do with federal support of research and research scientists and in federal trade and other policies.

But the number one recommendation was: “Increase America’s talent pool by vastly improving K–12 science and mathematics education.”

The NAS recommended that the federal government fund four-year scholarships of up to $20,000 a year to10,000 students majoring in either physical or life sciences and pursuing a K-12 teaching certification. The scholarships would require a 5-year commitment by recipients to teach, but would include a $10,000 a year bonus for those teaching in underserved schools in urban and rural areas.

It also recommended giving 100 universities up to $1 million a year for up to five years to integrate their science and teacher certification programs.

To reach current teachers, NAS proposes summer institutes, scientific master’s programs, and increased training for Advanced Placement and International Baccalaureate science teachers.

It also proposes building a national voluntary curriculum that will be geared to world-class scientific standards.

The report is an urgent call to action. To read it, go to the National Academies Press.


©2005 Achievement Alliance • Contact Us In This IssueMythbustersIt's Being DoneWhat's NewOther Voices